After a long period of
negotiations the 12 members of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) reached an
agreement on October 5th. This could have big implications for member countries
of TPP and for the rest of the world economy.
For Japan and US
the TPP has a great meaning. It will allow many Japanese goods to enter with no
tariffs to TPP markets like US (some will immediately go down to zero while others
will do after some years) especially products where Japan is very competitive
as electrical appliances, automobiles, industrial machinery, chemicals. For its
part US could sell more of its agricultural goods to Japan and invest more
there. But as important as it is in the economic side, also in the political
side he TPP will make stronger the alliance between Japan and U.S. It is part
of the US “pivot” to Asia strategy of President Obama. TPP rules will cover 40%
of the world economy and US will continue to reinforce its presence in the
Asian region with this agreement and for Japan it means that will have US on
its side in the coming future.
For Peru it could
mean better access to markets like Japan, even if we have already a Free Trade
Area with this country, and also access to new markets like Australia and
Vietnam. The issue for Peru is to have the products to sell to these markets.
Countries like Chile
and Mexico the TPP means that they will continue to sell more to markets in
Asia and North America. For countries like Colombia not a member of the TPP it
will make more urgent the need to reach trade agreements with countries in
Asia. In the case of Argentina and Brazil, they would continue being excluded because
their markets are closed and they are not eager to reach trade agreements with
other countries.
The multilateral
negotiations within the World Trade Organization are going nowhere as it is difficult
for the many countries there to reach an agreement among themselves and also because
discussions in some subjects, as labor standards or intellectual property
rights, is opposed by some of them. That’s why regional agreements like TPP are
in fashion now. So in the future probably the weakness of the WTO will become
more evident and trade agreements will be reached among group of countries who
share more similarities among themselves.
It could be said
that China could be the one which could lose more with the TPP, because for
example some Chinese products compete with Japanese goods and with the TPP
Japanese goods will get preferential access to TPP markets, and also because TPP
countries that use parts and components from China to manufacture some goods
now will prefer or will have to use parts and components from other TPP
countries to qualify for preferential access to other TPP markets. Other effect
is that investment from countries like US and Japan will get better access to other
TPP markets. In general new rules for services, investment, intellectual
property rights have been set up mainly by the US in the TPP and these US want
to establish also these rules in other agreements like in the TTIP (with
European Union countries) and China is being excluded from this process.
What can China do?
China should continue with its efforts to integrate more with the economies of
the East Asian region trying to conclude soon the Regional Comprehensive
Economic Partnership with the ASEAN group plus Japan, South Korea, India, Australia
and New Zealand. Also China should involve more countries in its strategy of
achieving its “one belt one road” initiative to reestablish the land and
maritime Silk Roads across Asia and Europe and to Africa, and make active use
of the Asian Investment and Infrastructure Bank, the BRICS New Development Bank
and other funds that is setting up. Chinese companies also should be more
active going abroad to invest not only in the natural resources sectors.
Finally China should continue to open more its economy, to foster competition
and continue the reforms to modernize more its economy.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario